arlen/benchOpen benchmarks for agentic consumers
INDEPENDENT · CC-BY-4.0
UPDATED 14 JUN 2026 · BERKELEY, CA
Vendor Profile · Illustrative prototype

Jina

Jina on the arlen/bench leaderboards — agent web-search accuracy, extraction fidelity, freshness, cost per verified-correct answer, and agent-readiness, scored against golden truth.

Answer firstillustrative

Jina #4 of 4 for extraction fidelity at 0.54, and is not yet agent-ready in live onboarding trials.

extraction fidelity
0.54
web extraction
agent-ready
No
onboarding harness
§ B

Web Extraction — Jina

snapshot web_extraction-2026-q2
Metric JinaLeaderboard bestDirection
fidelity 0-10.54Exa 0.74higher is better
phrase recall0.59Exa 0.67higher is better
boilerplate excl.0.26Exa 0.76higher is better
cost/correct $Exa $0.0047lower is better
coverage %99.3leadshigher is better
§ C

Compare Jina

Jina vs Exa Jina vs SerpAPI Jina vs Brave Jina vs Tavily Jina vs Firecrawl Jina vs Serper

Illustrative prototype. No verified vendor run has been published yet; every figure here is a placeholder and must not be cited as a measured result. Numbers are replaced when a snapshot’s first full run lands.