Vendor Profile · Illustrative prototype
Firecrawl
Firecrawl on the arlen/bench leaderboards — agent web-search accuracy, extraction fidelity, freshness, cost per verified-correct answer, and agent-readiness, scored against golden truth.
Answer firstillustrative
Firecrawl #2 of 4 for extraction fidelity at 0.66, and is not yet agent-ready in live onboarding trials.
extraction fidelity
0.66
web extraction
agent-ready
No
onboarding harness
§ B
Web Extraction — Firecrawl
| Metric | Firecrawl | Leaderboard best | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| fidelity 0-1 | 0.66 | Exa 0.74 | higher is better |
| phrase recall | 0.58 | Exa 0.67 | higher is better |
| boilerplate excl. | 0.64 | Exa 0.76 | higher is better |
| cost/correct $ | $0.0294 | Exa $0.0047 | lower is better |
| coverage % | 97.3 | Jina 99.3 | higher is better |
§ C
Firecrawl vs Exa Firecrawl vs SerpAPI Firecrawl vs Brave Firecrawl vs Tavily Firecrawl vs Jina Firecrawl vs SerperCompare Firecrawl
Illustrative prototype. No verified vendor run has been published yet; every figure here is a placeholder and must not be cited as a measured result. Numbers are replaced when a snapshot’s first full run lands.