Vendor Profile · Illustrative prototype
Exa
Exa on the arlen/bench leaderboards — agent web-search accuracy, extraction fidelity, freshness, cost per verified-correct answer, and agent-readiness, scored against golden truth.
Answer firstillustrative
Exa ranks #1 of 4 for agent web-search accuracy at 80.9% hit@5; #1 of 4 for extraction fidelity at 0.74, and is not yet agent-ready in live onboarding trials.
hit@5
80.9%
web search
cost / correct
—
not yet measured
extraction fidelity
0.74
web extraction
agent-ready
No
onboarding harness
§ A
Web Search — Exa
| Metric | Exa | Leaderboard best | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| hit@1 % | 62.2 | leads | higher is better |
| hit@5 % | 80.9 | leads | higher is better |
| fresh<30d % | — | — | higher is better |
| retrievability h | — | — | lower is better |
| cost/correct $ | — | — | lower is better |
| p50 latency ms | — | — | lower is better |
§ B
Web Extraction — Exa
| Metric | Exa | Leaderboard best | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| fidelity 0-1 | 0.74 | leads | higher is better |
| phrase recall | 0.67 | leads | higher is better |
| boilerplate excl. | 0.76 | leads | higher is better |
| cost/correct $ | $0.0047 | leads | lower is better |
| coverage % | 98.7 | Jina 99.3 | higher is better |
§ C
Exa vs SerpAPI Exa vs Brave Exa vs Tavily Exa vs Firecrawl Exa vs Jina Exa vs SerperCompare Exa
Illustrative prototype. No verified vendor run has been published yet; every figure here is a placeholder and must not be cited as a measured result. Numbers are replaced when a snapshot’s first full run lands.